Colton Shotgun

Question
Mr. Little: I ran across a Q&A forum you had responded to about a Colton sidelock shotgun. I too have a Colton, left to me by my father, however mine is an external hammer model. I have examined the gun and found no evidence of a serial # or anything that looks like a number having been removed. Do you have any thoughts on my gun's aprox age, and weather it might be worth some restoring. The right hammer spur is broken, and the left has been used so much that the lock will not hold the hammer back any longer. Otherwise the gun is in reasonably good cond, no rust etc...
         Thanks for your time,  Craig

Answer
Craig,

Sorry for the delay in getting back to you.  I wrote a response to you three days ago, but apparently it didn't go through.  

Colton Manufacturing existed between 1894 and 1902.  In 1902 they were purchased by Union Firearms.  Union Firearms made a shotgun that was similar to the one you are describing from 1902 to 1907.  Some of the guns made by Union Firearms carried the brand name "Colton Firearms".  Many of the guns they made were 'store brands' for other companies.

Gun made during this time period rarely had serial numbers.  Legally, serial numbers were not required on any long guns prior to 1968.  It is not unusual that is would not have a serial number.

My best guess is that your gun dates to the five year period between 1902 and 1907.  I'd suggest that based on the condition you are describing, it may not be worth the money to try and restore it.  You are probably looking at a current valuation of $150 or less if it is that worn.  

In addition, you should probably understand that guns made during this period are generally not safe to shoot.  They were simply not made strong enough to withstand the pressures generated by modern ammunition.

You can check for parts at http://www.gunpartscorp.com   

Look under the Union Firearms brand, but overall I'd say you would most likely spend more that you would get back.  The really collectable ones are in excellent 'original' condition, not restorations.

I hope this helps you out...

Best regards,

Doug Little